#1
Posted 03 December 2011 - 11:19 PM
#2
Posted 04 December 2011 - 05:46 AM
6z GFS is about as good as you could hope for for 95 points east given what is on the table. Possibly another needle can be thread.
#3
Posted 04 December 2011 - 10:07 AM
#4
Posted 04 December 2011 - 10:07 AM
#5
Posted 04 December 2011 - 10:13 AM
JB on Twitter
Quote
Mid atlantic snow threat evolving on tail end of warmth, front part of cold period Thur.
LETS GO METS
#6
Posted 04 December 2011 - 10:54 AM
#7
Posted 04 December 2011 - 11:20 AM
#8
Posted 04 December 2011 - 11:40 AM
Really nice hit for areas north and west of the City. The City also gets a few inches based off the snowmap.
LETS GO METS
#9
Posted 04 December 2011 - 11:42 AM
#10
Posted 04 December 2011 - 11:46 AM
12z gfs show a big inland hit 4.5 days out. That's key. If this winter reverts back to typical winters (unlike the last two), this will change a dozen times and I wouldn't buy into any of it at this point. BTW, NYC surface temp is from 38 to 36 during the bulk of precip.
West Milford NJ
#11
Posted 04 December 2011 - 11:47 AM
None of the other models are as strong as the GFS. GFS has been awful of late. Not sure if I buy this yet.
LETS GO METS
#12
Posted 04 December 2011 - 11:48 AM
robbbs, on Dec 4 2011, 11:46 AM, said:
12z gfs show a big inland hit 4.5 days out. That's key. If this winter reverts back to typical winters (unlike the last two), this will change a dozen times and I wouldn't buy into any of it at this point. BTW, NYC surface temp is from 38 to 36 during the bulk of precip.
Do the models have more trouble in La Nina years than El Nino years? We saw this same thing happen last winter.
LETS GO METS
#13
Posted 04 December 2011 - 12:00 PM
metfan4life, on Dec 4 2011, 04:48 PM, said:
Do the models have more trouble in La Nina years than El Nino years? We saw this same thing happen last winter.
Here's the thing. Let's look at the end of week system as a test of another potential indicator of a possible change in our climate. If the storm really does throw snow in our area (big IF), coupled with the rare October snowfall, and the last several winters, there may be something to the theory that global warming is causing the waters of the north Atlantic to have warmed and impacted our winters in terms of more snowfall. Some mets believe there may be a parallel between warm north Atlantic waters, and more troughs and / or negative NAO's along the eastern seaboard. If that theory holds, you could get enhanced snowfall in our region, even without arctic or truly cold air in place, presuming it's cold enough for snow. In other words, a favorable storm track trumps other factors and results in more snowfall for our region.
West Milford NJ
#14
Posted 04 December 2011 - 12:07 PM
#15
Posted 04 December 2011 - 12:26 PM
And let the game begin!
#16
Posted 04 December 2011 - 01:40 PM
Looks like the NAO may help us out by going negative.. The latest indication is for the NAO to start going negative...
#17
Posted 04 December 2011 - 11:10 PM
0z GFS looks like the Euro and the GGEM. It shreds the storm apart and OTS.
LETS GO METS
#18
Posted 05 December 2011 - 07:14 AM
6z GFS shifted west and the Nam shifted east. Models are playing games once again.
LETS GO METS
#19
Posted 05 December 2011 - 08:09 AM
robbbs, on Dec 4 2011, 12:00 PM, said:
Here's the thing. Let's look at the end of week system as a test of another potential indicator of a possible change in our climate. If the storm really does throw snow in our area (big IF), coupled with the rare October snowfall, and the last several winters, there may be something to the theory that global warming is causing the waters of the north Atlantic to have warmed and impacted our winters in terms of more snowfall. Some mets believe there may be a parallel between warm north Atlantic waters, and more troughs and / or negative NAO's along the eastern seaboard. If that theory holds, you could get enhanced snowfall in our region, even without arctic or truly cold air in place, presuming it's cold enough for snow. In other words, a favorable storm track trumps other factors and results in more snowfall for our region.
On a large scale, cooling makes cooling, and warming makes warming. During an ice age, large snowpack areas cause further cooling by reflecting IR radiation from the earth. The opposite is also true, less snowpack area increases the earth's absorption of IR radiation, warming the earth.
2011-2012 Accumulating Snow and Ice
October 29: 3.0 inches
January 21 - 3.1 inches
February 8 - 0.75 inches
February 11 - 0.5 Inches
Total to-date - 7.4 inches
Lowest temperature -- January 4: 10 F
October 29: 3.0 inches
January 21 - 3.1 inches
February 8 - 0.75 inches
February 11 - 0.5 Inches
Total to-date - 7.4 inches
Lowest temperature -- January 4: 10 F
#20
Posted 05 December 2011 - 09:21 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
Sign In
Create Account

Back to top












