http://www.regiftabl...RobinPopUp.html
How does she do this?
Play the game with the sound on. I'll give the solution in a few days with a spoiler warning. FD
#1
Posted 04 March 2009 - 08:44 AM
2011-2012 Accumulating Snow and Ice
October 29: 3.0 inches
January 21 - 3.1 inches
February 8 - 0.75 inches
February 11 - 0.5 Inches
Total to-date - 7.4 inches
Lowest temperature -- January 4: 10 F
October 29: 3.0 inches
January 21 - 3.1 inches
February 8 - 0.75 inches
February 11 - 0.5 Inches
Total to-date - 7.4 inches
Lowest temperature -- January 4: 10 F
#2
Posted 04 March 2009 - 12:49 PM
Ha that was pretty clever but I figured it out. Took me a few times to see it.
Mike
NWS Meteorologist
South Burlington, VT
Elevation: 332 ft
Snowfall 2011-2012: 37.7"
Jonesville, VT
Elevation: 323 ft
Snowfall 2011-2012: 59.5"
The views expressed in this post are solely mine and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Weather Service.
NWS Meteorologist
South Burlington, VT
Elevation: 332 ft
Snowfall 2011-2012: 37.7"
Jonesville, VT
Elevation: 323 ft
Snowfall 2011-2012: 59.5"
The views expressed in this post are solely mine and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Weather Service.
#3
Posted 04 March 2009 - 01:03 PM
#4
Posted 04 March 2009 - 01:09 PM
rgwp96, on Mar 4 2009, 01:03 PM, said:
it really isnt to hard to figure it out
It's like any of the number ones.
Mike
NWS Meteorologist
South Burlington, VT
Elevation: 332 ft
Snowfall 2011-2012: 37.7"
Jonesville, VT
Elevation: 323 ft
Snowfall 2011-2012: 59.5"
The views expressed in this post are solely mine and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Weather Service.
NWS Meteorologist
South Burlington, VT
Elevation: 332 ft
Snowfall 2011-2012: 37.7"
Jonesville, VT
Elevation: 323 ft
Snowfall 2011-2012: 59.5"
The views expressed in this post are solely mine and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Weather Service.
#5
Posted 06 March 2009 - 09:36 AM
Solution -
The trick works by seeming to "know" the gift your calculation assigns. However, the number you calculate (with its corresponding gift) will always be from the limited set of numbers which are calculatable by what they tell you to do. That limited set of numbers always has the same gift assignment, see e.g., 45, 9, 27, and 18 (the example number); which, of course, the program "knows."
There are a few magician's misdirections.
The first part, choosing the number, is the first misdirection and has no effect whatsoever on being able to "know" your gift. The math simply limits the set of numbers to those calculatable by the computation they tell you to do (to enable the next two deceptions).
A second misdirection is that most of the numbers/gifts shown are dummies to make the amount of possible selections appear to be greater and to hide that limited set of numbers and like gifts. The other numbers are not calculatable from the math process they tell you to do.
A third deception is that it shuffles the gift-number assignment on each play, so if you play it multiple times, it appears to be able to "know" any one of the gifts that the calculation has assigned.
Of course, thinking of the gift has absolutely no effect, but contributes to the ruse.
The trick works by seeming to "know" the gift your calculation assigns. However, the number you calculate (with its corresponding gift) will always be from the limited set of numbers which are calculatable by what they tell you to do. That limited set of numbers always has the same gift assignment, see e.g., 45, 9, 27, and 18 (the example number); which, of course, the program "knows."
There are a few magician's misdirections.
The first part, choosing the number, is the first misdirection and has no effect whatsoever on being able to "know" your gift. The math simply limits the set of numbers to those calculatable by the computation they tell you to do (to enable the next two deceptions).
A second misdirection is that most of the numbers/gifts shown are dummies to make the amount of possible selections appear to be greater and to hide that limited set of numbers and like gifts. The other numbers are not calculatable from the math process they tell you to do.
A third deception is that it shuffles the gift-number assignment on each play, so if you play it multiple times, it appears to be able to "know" any one of the gifts that the calculation has assigned.
Of course, thinking of the gift has absolutely no effect, but contributes to the ruse.
2011-2012 Accumulating Snow and Ice
October 29: 3.0 inches
January 21 - 3.1 inches
February 8 - 0.75 inches
February 11 - 0.5 Inches
Total to-date - 7.4 inches
Lowest temperature -- January 4: 10 F
October 29: 3.0 inches
January 21 - 3.1 inches
February 8 - 0.75 inches
February 11 - 0.5 Inches
Total to-date - 7.4 inches
Lowest temperature -- January 4: 10 F
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
Sign In
Create Account

Back to top











