1 reply to this topic

[Stormchaser]

Saw that JB posted an article this morning on climate change and found it interesting. Things have been slow on the weather side so I posted it here.

Link is at the bottom.



As the clock ticks down towards December's historic UN Copenhagen conference on climate change, the frenzied efforts of the warmists to panic us over all that vanishing Arctic and Antarctic ice are degenerating into farce.

That great authority Ban Ki-moon, the UN's Secretary-General, solemnly tells us that the polar ice caps are "melting far faster than was expected just two years ago".Yet the latest satellite information from the US National Snow and Ice Data Center (passed on by the Watts Up With That blog) shows that, after the third slowest melt of April Arctic ice in 30 years, the world's polar sea ice is in fact slightly above its average extent for early May since satellite records began in 1979.

This news came as the skiinfo.com website was reporting "It's snowing all over the world". Snow was still falling in the Alps after a record winter, while in the southern hemisphere the skiing season was starting "five weeks early".

Meanwhile, up in the Arctic, after yet another delay for bad weather, the hapless Catlin trio, sponsored by an insurance firm which hopes to make money out of alarm over global warming, continue their painful progress towards the distant North Pole, measuring the ice with an old tape measure and assuring Prince Charles by satellite telephone that it is "thinner than expected".

When the trio heard a passing aircraft, which they hoped was bringing much-needed supplies, they little realised it was a DC-3 carrying an international team of scientists, using the latest electro-magnetic induction equipment to discover rather more efficiently that the ice was in fact "twice as thick" as they had expected.

A last symbolic drama was the fate of another three-man expedition aiming to publicise the effects of climate change. Followed by schools across Britain, they were aiming to reach Greenland in a "carbon-free" boat powered only by wind and the sun. Last week, after running into appalling weather, they were rescued by – it had to be – a US oil tanker. I wonder whether the schoolchildren were told.



http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columni...e-warmists.html

[Stormchaser]

It's interesting how the tables are now turning in favor of those who have been on the cyclic climate variation bandwagon for some time. If one notes the climate regime of the late 70s-90s, it's no surprise that the drastic warming of that period transpired -- 1) The Pacific decadal oscillation reversed to its warm phase, i.e., warmer sea surface temperature anomalies encompassing the majority of the Pacific, 2) The Atlantic multidecadal oscillation also flipped warm in the early/mid 90s which further exacerbated the warming, 3) Solar output was extremely high in the 70s-90s -- sunspot cycles were unusally high with peaks of about 150-180 sunspots per month, 4) In addition the natural thermostat of the Earth is in a warming stage as we emerge from the 1700s-1800s Little Ice Age.

I'm not disputing the necessity of renewable energy sources (in fact I believe it's a wise idea that we begin focusing more on them), but what I do NOT like is academic dishonesty and bias of the folks who are conducting these studies, in order to gain more money via the global warming agenda. It's clear to me that any minimal anthropogenic influence in terms of the past century's warming is/will be greatly outweighed by the Earth's natural variation itself.