QUOTE (icehater @ May 25 2010, 10:37 PM)

I think a lot of folks misunderstand the dangers these folks really face. Many tornadic storms in the midwest are fairly dry or have minimal rain areas. Heck i've seen some F3's that came out of clouds that didn't even look trhreatening with sunshine almost near the core of the storm. Those are more predictable in path. But when the moisture is loaded on the ground and you have a lot more rain you enter the dangerous situation of rain wrapped tornados. Also heavy rain in these storms can also cause microbursts. Maybe the most important thing of all though is that rainy tornadic storms can cause a lot of re-orientation on where a tornado jumps to. What may seem like a safe location can easily change as the initial tornado vanishes and another one at a different edge of the storm reforms and pulls the storm in a different direction. If you are not at a safe distance or if you assumed the storm would not change direction you could instantly be in trouble. There was a scenec in Twister like that where the competitor chaser got wiped out. Also I think the infamous Oklahoma city tornado had heavy rain that reoriented the tornado to a different part of the storm and then that re-orientation caused the storm to hit the town instead of miss it wide as was originally thought.
Yes very true. They try to stay pretty far away from the high precipitation supercells that cause rain-wrapped tornadoes. This was one of the reasons they weren't able to fully intercept the one that Bettes and The Weather Channel had coverage on for hours that night. They could never get in a safe position to fully observe the tornado.
And according to the team, most of the chase days have involved high precipitation supercells, with not many opportunities to chase the dryer tornadic storms, hence the lack of good intercepts again this year. Another thing to try to avoid is the hail core. Well, they failed one day in the second week of operation, and they lost a wind shield.